PR Review Briefs for Coding Agents: Risks First, LGTM Last
PR Review Briefs for Coding Agents: Risks First, LGTM Last
By AgentOps Lab
You already paste diffs into an agent. What still fails: rubber-stamp “LGTM,” invented CI green, and review threads that never become a reusable brief. This post is a PR-review ritual for engineers and tech leads—not a job guarantee, not fake earnings screenshots.
You will leave with a brief shape, a severity split (blockers vs nits), and a path to try one installable SKILL.md for free.
The symptom: every PR reinvents the checklist
Typical week:
- Monday — agent praises style and ignores auth path changes.
- Tuesday — “LGTM” with no test-gap callout.
- Wednesday — you re-ask the same five questions the author already answered in the description.
- Thursday — a silent migration lands because blast radius was never written down.
That is not “the model being dumb.” It is missing review ops. Reviews need a job description the agent can follow: restate intent → map blast radius → rank risks → name test gaps → separate blockers from nits → ask the author ≤5 sharp questions.
Brief shape you can paste into a skill
Intent (1 sentence):
Blast radius: files / APIs / data / auth / migrations / flags
Risks (ranked):
Test coverage vs change:
Blockers:
Nits:
Ask author (≤5):
Suggested merge stance: approve / request changes / needs more context
Rule: the agent must fill blast radius and risks before any praise. If those are empty, the brief is theater.
Blockers vs nits (keep them separate)
| Bucket | Meaning | Merge stance |
|---|---|---|
| Blocker | Correctness, security, data loss, missing tests for the change | Request changes |
| Nit | Naming, comments, optional cleanup | Approve optional; do not block |
| Question | Ambiguity the author must clarify | Hold until answered |
Agents love merging categories. Your skill must forbid “nits that sound like blockers” and “blockers buried in a friendly paragraph.”
15-minute drill (use a sanitized PR)
| Minutes | Action |
|---|---|
| 2 | Paste PR title/body + diff summary with secrets removed |
| 3 | Force intent + blast radius in one screen |
| 5 | Ask the agent (with skill) for risks / test gaps / ask-author |
| 5 | Edit yourself; never ship invented CI results |
Done looks like: a brief you would paste into the PR as a human reviewer. If you would not hit send, the skill or context is incomplete—not “the model.”
Hard rules worth putting in SKILL.md
- Do not invent CI green, coverage %, or “tests passed”
- Do not encourage merging known security holes
- Do not invent secrets or bypass auth “for convenience”
- If the diff is missing, ask — do not fabricate it
Try the free teaser
Install PR Review Brief from the free Coding Agent Ops teaser (1 skill · sample prompts · PR brief template):
→ Coding Agent Ops free teaser on itch
Hub page: AgentOps Lab — Coding Agent Ops
The full pack ($19) adds bug-repro, refactor plans, test-gap scans, changelogs, incident notes, and more — optional after you like the brief format. No job, promo, or earnings promises. Files only.
AgentOps Lab builds installable ops skills for AI agents. Deep links only — we do not ask you to trust anonymous store roots.
About the author
- AgentOps Lab ships ready-to-run skills, prompts, and workflows. Browse free teasers → paid packs: https://agentops-lab.netlify.app/ · No fake earnings claims.
Comments
Join the discussionNo comments yet. Be the first to comment.